0 Group/Tag Based Specific Person Attributes 4 Arran France posted 10 Years Ago Hey, I'm not sure about the most productive way for going about this so I wondered whether there was an obvious solution. Certain broad groups in our church (kids, youth, etc.) would benefit from having person attributes to indicate which bits of our discipleship they've been through and the (rough) date they completed certain stages. Accessing this information from their person page would be the easiest in terms of administration. Adding greater complexity is that when these people progress out of that group (kids to youth, youth to general) it'd still be beneficial for that data to remain. Is there an out of the box solution Rock has for this behaviour? Edit for clarity: I'm aiming for the the Person Attribute fields to only be visible if the person is part of the group or tag that the fields arespecific to but then persist after the person has left the group.
Arran France 9 years ago I'm not entirely sure if that would achieve what we're aiming for. My original topic wasn't particularly clear about what we're trying to achieve, probably because I was quite new to Rock.Some things we'd like to track only apply to people in the church who are either a child (0-11) or a student (11-18). Some of this information we'd only want to retain while they're a child (whether they can be contacted outside of church) and some we'd want to track only if they're a child or only if they'd once been a child whilst a part of the church (e.g. Whether they'd completed steps as part of a student discipleship pathway).We want to keep the person active -- but we want some information to only be visible if they meet the age criteria OR if they once met the age criteria.I'm fairly certain this isn't currently possible.
Frank Grand 9 years ago Arran, it does sound like this would be a feature request. If you haven't already, you can submit the idea here: rockrms.com/ideas
Jeremy Hoff 10 years ago Hi Arran,It sounds like you are looking for what amounts to "Group-centric Badges" or "Group-specific Badges" ? Is that about right?