In the legacy Communication Entry block, users had the ability to remove all recipients from a communication with a single click. This was a frequently used feature in our workflow—particularly when copying a previously sent communication to resend to a smaller group. We could quickly clear the original recipient list and add only the intended few.In the new v17 Communication Entry block (Simple Communication Editor), this functionality appears to be missing. Currently, users must remove recipients one at a time, which is inefficient and time-consuming when working with larger lists.Use Case: • Send an email to a large group • Copy that...

---

When a user selects a custom communication template that has pre-filled fields for the additional fields, such as Reply To and BCC, the fields do not clear if the user returns to the previous screen and re-selects a template that does not pre-fill those fields. Rather, the additional fields typically stay minimized for the user and since the re-selection of the template does not clear these fields, they stay pre-filled from the previous template which caused a miscommunication on a 100+ recipient email in our instance. We’re asking that the re-selection of the template would clear all fields, including the additional...

---

A block that allows a logged in user to see what all they are signed up for, and to change the opportunity they are signed up for.Example: - They they wanted to serve at a different time slot.- Remove serving all together.

---

✉️ Resend an Unopened Email Option for Communications Description: It would be incredibly helpful to have an option in Rock Communications to resend an email to recipients who did not open it after a designated period of time—similar to features available in Mailchimp and other email platforms.Example: https://eepurl.com/dyimxL Problem: While Rock provides great tools for sending and tracking email communications, there’s currently no native way to automatically resend an email to people who didn’t open it the first time. For ministries and departments trying to reach their audience (especially for event invites, volunteer needs, or time-sensitive updates), it often requires...

---

We noticed that the Job that pushes out that there is a new activity for a course in LMS doesn't honor the group level communication preference or the person level communication preference. It only sends emails. We would like it if people could choose if they want text or emails and then send new activity communications accordingly.

---

I think it would be really swell if we could limit the number of items that show up on the Media Element Content channel item. Some of LCBC's media syncs are 400 videos and get updated weekly or even daily. I was hoping that we could get a way to limit to down to maybe 50 without deleting items.

---

We use the attribute field type of Group Member at times to use with another Group member attribute. What I find is that it does not limit the choices of the selected group members to only active members. I propose that there be an added option to indicate if you only want to display or use "Active" group members in the referenced group.

---

Right now in Rock’s Group Scheduling, volunteers can only select one preferred role per service time. This creates a limitation when someone is willing to serve in more than one way at the same time.For example, a volunteer might prefer to be an Usher at 8 AM, but would also be happy to serve as a Host at 8 AM if there are already enough Ushers. Currently, there’s no way to indicate that kind of secondary option and allow the automated scheduling to know about it.It would be really helpful to allow a second preferred role for the same service...

---

Hello! Would be nice to set a Step Status as the Default for new entries. Connections has an option as Is Default. One less field to set when doing a Bulk entry. 

---

Current Limitation:Right now, Rock’s Steps feature allows automatic completion of a step based on a selected Data View. However, automation is limited to step completion only.Proposed Enhancement:It would be extremely helpful to enable selecting a separate Data View for each individual status within a Step (e.g., “Started,” “In Progress,” “Completed”). This would allow users to automate progress more flexibly—automatically triggering both the start and progression of a step, not just completion.Example Use Case:Instead of manually marking when someone “starts” a step, a Data View could automatically move people into the “Started” status as soon as they meet certain defined criteria...

---